Worcestershire worst for 16 and 17 year olds not in education or training

Bromsgrove Advertiser: The figures were released by the Department for Education The figures were released by the Department for Education

WORCESTERSHIRE has the worst figures in the country for the number of 16 and 17 year olds in training or education it has been revealed.

Figures released by the Department for Education show only 68.9 per cent of the county's 16 and 17 year olds were known to be in education or training, much lower than the national figure of 89.8 per cent.

The number also represents a dramatic 20 per cent drop compared to the county's figure of 89.4 per cent for last year.

The figures released are the first to come out since a change in the law demanding young people must stay in some form of education and training for longer.

Those leaving year 11 in summer 2013 must carry on with full-time education, an apprenticeship or go to work but with some part-time training until this June.

Those who started in year 11 this academic year will have to continue until at least their 18th birthday.

However, Worcestershire County Councilor Liz Eyre blamed data collection problems for the poor performance.

She said this year the county has a much larger number of 'unknowns' - where the council has no record of what they are doing - than before..

Cllr Eyre, cabinet member for Children and Families, said the number of county schools that were now academies and working autonomously may have made it more difficult for the council to access the relevant information than in the past.

Related links

In December 2013, 26.5 per cent were unknown compared to only four per cent the previous year.

Cllr Eyre said: "The number of young people not in education, employment or training has improved by 10 per cent but we do have a number of young people whose employment/education status is unknown to us, which is not acceptable.

"This has impacted our figures, so disappointingly Worcestershire's recorded figure is low compared to other authorities and neighbouring counties."

She said newly developed analysis tools would help get more sophisticated information.

Cllr Eyre said the council seemed to have "dropped the ball."

She added: "I have asked the question why have we got so many unknowns?

"Why are we not getting the information that we used to get?

"I'm told we are putting in place a system to make sure this doesn't happen again.

"I think it's about working with the schools even more closely."

She said the council needed to unpick the figures to find out whether those not in education or training were people who were able to participate or not before concentrating its efforts on helping those who could find education, jobs or training.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:41am Mon 31 Mar 14

brooksider says...

Shouldn't the Chamber of Commerce and the Worcestershire LEP be doing more to improve the training and job prospects of Worcestershire's young?
Shouldn't the Chamber of Commerce and the Worcestershire LEP be doing more to improve the training and job prospects of Worcestershire's young? brooksider
  • Score: 3

11:31am Mon 31 Mar 14

Worcesterfarian says...

Unfortunately the situation is set to get worse...
http://www.worcester
news.co.uk/education
/11113541.Mystery_le
tter_urges_oppositio
n_to_college_merger/
?ref=mr
Unfortunately the situation is set to get worse... http://www.worcester news.co.uk/education /11113541.Mystery_le tter_urges_oppositio n_to_college_merger/ ?ref=mr Worcesterfarian
  • Score: 7

12:58pm Mon 31 Mar 14

G Joffers says...

Bit of a harsh reaction to the idea of a Worcestershire College, isn't it? Councils have been sharing functions to try and protect services against funding cuts for a while and it's worked quite well.
I don't know anything about the situation at the college (many many years since I studied there) and so am unable to comment specifically on the proposals but personally, I'd welcome the politician that stands up and says they would move to support genuine improvements in "efficiency": by giving permanent extra funding to places that do it. What I mean is, I would accept small, reasonable increases in tax if the idea was to put that extra money into a separate pot to be granted only to reformed services, not just to support unreformed services.
So say the colleges are forced to save £x because of funding cuts, but they manage to cut zero courses because they've saved it in other (sustainable!) ways, then that work should be rewarded with a portion of that extra money in permanent income, supporting more courses and better facilities being delivered out of a clearly well-run institution.
I'm sure there are civil servants with the necessary guile to set up such a system that would reward success without being so mercenary as having the free market apply to public services (which I do not agree with).
Bit of a harsh reaction to the idea of a Worcestershire College, isn't it? Councils have been sharing functions to try and protect services against funding cuts for a while and it's worked quite well. I don't know anything about the situation at the college (many many years since I studied there) and so am unable to comment specifically on the proposals but personally, I'd welcome the politician that stands up and says they would move to support genuine improvements in "efficiency": by giving permanent extra funding to places that do it. What I mean is, I would accept small, reasonable increases in tax if the idea was to put that extra money into a separate pot to be granted only to reformed services, not just to support unreformed services. So say the colleges are forced to save £x because of funding cuts, but they manage to cut zero courses because they've saved it in other (sustainable!) ways, then that work should be rewarded with a portion of that extra money in permanent income, supporting more courses and better facilities being delivered out of a clearly well-run institution. I'm sure there are civil servants with the necessary guile to set up such a system that would reward success without being so mercenary as having the free market apply to public services (which I do not agree with). G Joffers
  • Score: -4

7:16pm Wed 2 Apr 14

Mrs Barlow says...

Can't see this figure being helped when Worcester Tech College disappears?
Can't see this figure being helped when Worcester Tech College disappears? Mrs Barlow
  • Score: 3

4:58pm Thu 3 Apr 14

DonkeyFace says...

Its interesting that these figures coincide with cuts to Youth Services, careers services and support for schools- All of which were agreed by Cllr Liz Eyre.

The Council have dropped the ball, Cllr Eyre is portfolio holder for this area!!!
Its interesting that these figures coincide with cuts to Youth Services, careers services and support for schools- All of which were agreed by Cllr Liz Eyre. The Council have dropped the ball, Cllr Eyre is portfolio holder for this area!!! DonkeyFace
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree