News RSS Feed


Bosses say there are plans for two sites but won’t say where they are


HEALTH bosses are considering two possible sites for car parks to reduce parking problems at Worcestershire Royal Hospital but have declined to give more details.

They hope the extra spaces will reduce pressure at Worcester’s main hospital.

Leaders at Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust were asked to consider the issue by health watchdog member and Worcester city councillor Roger Berry at a recent trust board meeting at Kidderminster Hospital.

Phil Milligan, the trust’s chief operating officer, said at the meeting: “Our estates team are looking at two sites. It is too early to say more.”

Your Worcester News contacted the communications department to find out more information about the sites under consideration and details of how many spaces would be provided if the plans went ahead and how much it would cost. A spokesman said he could not reveal any more information.

We have already revealed how long-suffering residents complain that ‘access only’ roads near to the hospital are treated like an ‘overflow car park’.

Equally, staff and pat-ients have complained that they cannot find a space in the hospital and have no choice but to park in adjacent roads. The worst-affected are Linksview Crescent, Aconbury Close and Leopard Rise.

Your Worcester News has also reported how health chiefs have ruled out plans for a £11 million multi-storey at the hospital site in Charles Hastings Way which may have helped.

Mr Milligan said he would rather the cash was spent on things which benefited the health of pat-ients, including radiotherapy for cancer patients, MRI scanners, CT scanners and improvements at the county’s other main hospitals, the Alexandra Hospital in Redditch and Kidderminster Hospital.

Mr Milligan hopes staff at the Royal will be able to use 200 car parking spaces at Sixways Stadium in Worcester by October, freeing up more spaces for patients.

Coun Berry, who is also a member of Worcestershire County Council’s health overview and scrutiny committee, said he hoped hospital chiefs would be able to resolve the problem and use land near the hospital at an industrial park at Worcester Woods for parking which he said would become increasingly important as the population of the city grew.

He said: “I would welcome any potential sites for car parking.

“We need to have a hospital that will meet the needs of an expanding south Worcestershire population. To be fair, they are beginning to admit that the hospital is too small for current needs so clearly too small for future needs.”

Hospital bosses have already doubled the number of car parking spaces from 600 to 1,200 since the hospital opened in March 2002.


Your Say Your Bromsgrove

CJH, Worcester says...
11:34am Mon 6 Jul 09

I saw the wardrobe in the carpark, what are the parking charges like in Narnia?

jabbadad, Worcester says...
1:34pm Mon 6 Jul 09

Not wishing to be boring, but when the Hospital was still in planning on paper as it were, the Ronkswood Action Group were attending meetings where those representing the Hospital were told so many times that their figures on Patients, Staff and car parking just didn't stand up. All sorts of proposals were put forward, none of which, due to consortium money, ever came to fruition. The Hospital board even had an option on adjoining ground for expansion, which obviously lapsed and so the New £150 million + Hospital is now land-locked and can only go up (which due to surrounding properties is against planning) or down. Now there's a thought, But of course they proposed to move the Balancing Lake or even raft build over it. And to build a Multi Story car park was not on the Consortium developers agenda unless it would become a profit centre in it's own right, which would require high hourly charges per 24 hour day. So having sold the ground to develop the Office blocks the wisdom of the then New Labour City Council was evident. Councilors were under government instruction as to the present outcome.

Hawlev, Droitwich says...
1:36pm Mon 6 Jul 09

I spent quite a long time in hospital last year and parking for my partner was diifcult, but I do hope that they are not considering building on the fields next to the hospital as this land is frequently used by dog walkers and also breaks up all the roads, building in the area

CJH, Worcester says...
2:35pm Mon 6 Jul 09

Hawlev wrote:
I spent quite a long time in hospital last year and parking for my partner was diifcult, but I do hope that they are not considering building on the fields next to the hospital as this land is frequently used by dog walkers and also breaks up all the roads, building in the area
Hmm...walking the dog? Or parking the car to get access to treatment or visit patients? Tough decision.

BarryB, Worcester says...
2:49pm Mon 6 Jul 09

I will believe this additional parking when I see it. For the information of Mr. Milligan, I sincerely hope that the staff buck and kick against the stupid proposal that they park at Sixways, why should they be expected once again to get the dirty done on them over the appalling car parking situation. perhaps those that advocate this would like to do almost a double shift then have to make their way to Sixways to pick up their car. I bet this does not apply to the bosses.
Once again we will get the run around and nothing done, we have been complaining about this for years - in fact ever since it opened.

crowquill, Pershore says...
2:52pm Mon 6 Jul 09

“We need to have a hospital that will meet the needs of an expanding south Worcestershire population. To be fair, they are beginning to admit that the hospital is too small for current needs so clearly too small for future needs.”

So just who exactly is being held responsible for this fiasco? .....No one and that is exactly what is wrong with this country!
The people that make these decisions should be held fully accountable for their mistakes otherwise they just continue to make mistake after mistake until they retire when in fact they should be sacked after the first one!

BarryB, Worcester says...
3:42pm Mon 6 Jul 09

Exactly crowquill, even before a brick was laid, these people were told that it was not large enough neither were there sufficient car parking facilities. As usual though, we the hoi polloi or the peasants didn't know what was good for us and only the "experts" knew.
The end results are there for all to see and the idiots responsible are bulletproof enjoying massive salaries and mouth watering pensions.
Accountability - joke.
But we were told that this was a PFI venture, why can't some additional PFI produce the £11 million needed for a multi storey car park then.

Hawlev, Droitwich says...
4:21pm Mon 6 Jul 09

In response to CJH, why should we loose all our green areas because they didn't bother to plan parking correctly in the first place. Perhaps the old Ronkswood site should be developed as nothing seems to be happening there.

CJH, Worcester says...
5:38pm Mon 6 Jul 09

Hawlev I am a firm defender of green belt land, but sometimes you have to make tough decisions for the benefit of the community. In this case patients, visitors and staff must outweigh any other consideration. I have also been in hospital recently, and it is stressful enough without worrying about parking for your visitors or the staff looking after you, or getting to follow up appointments.

No, they didn't consider parking properly, but from your comment, are you really saying that because it wasn’t planned correctly in the first place then we, (that is the community using the hospital) must continue to suffer because it is more important to protect a couple of fields? As for parking at Ronkswood (or at Sixways) – would you want to make that walk in bad weather or at night? I don’t think so.

And like everyone else who has posted on this topic I would like some accountability, but suspect they have all taken early retirement on substantial pensions. Bet there's no parking problems at private hospitals!

jabbadad, Worcester says...
11:27pm Mon 6 Jul 09

As to the expansion of the Hospital, again the Ronkswood Action Group went to a presentation where the representatives of the American Architects were displaying the plans for the new hospital. And I clearly recall them being excited over the design to enable the change of the wards by movable panels so they could operate as 4, bed 6 bed or multiples thereon. But also the design of the Hospital were to be as spokes in a wheel, and all of the spokes would have all the services, electric, plumbing, in fact anything to enable the building to grow length ways and then the services could just be connected and on we go. So it was vital that ground around the Hospital was available for expansion. But was it? Well no is the answer. So exciting designs apart from corridors not wide enough for bed trolleys to pass thus requiring a one way bed transport system. NO THIS IS NOT A JOKE.
As to the old Hospital site this no longer belongs to the NHS and was sold to a private consortium as part housing and part Industrial at a much lower price per acre. The story of this development is like a TV soap, the difference is that this is for real. As to the comments about using public transport and not cars, this was always on the agenda, and also had the support of some members of the Worcester Civic Society, who also thought that visitors and patients could walk or cycle. YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP COULD YOU.

Your sayYour Bromsgrove

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Bromsgrove Advertiser account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.


LOCAL WEBSITES

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »