Bill for county incinerator spirals 2,000 per cent off course

INCINERATOR: Worcestershire County Council's bill to build a controversial incinerator spiralled 2,000 per cent off course it has been revealed. SP

INCINERATOR: Worcestershire County Council's bill to build a controversial incinerator spiralled 2,000 per cent off course it has been revealed. SP

First published in News

THE bill for consultancy work and legal fees run up by Worcestershire County Council, to build a controversial incinerator in Worcestershire, totalled nearly £900,000, it has been revealed.

The costs during the run-up to the £165 million rubbish burner being given the go-ahead went 20 times over budget.

Work has now started on the incinerator, due to open in Hartlebury in 2017.

Figures released show the council’s budget spiralled 2,000 per cent off course.

These included, in 2013/14, £22,950 being set aside for legal fees on the council’s Private Finance Initiative, but instead spiralling to £314,486.

The authority also budgeted to spend just £19,489 on consultants’ advice - but this bill rose to a staggering £556,715.

It means, despite budgeting to spend around £42,000 in both areas last year, the end cost ran to a whopping £870,000.

Rob Wilden, from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Action Group that protested against the facility, said: “This is completely off the Richter scale.

“You couldn’t run a business like this, but for some reason the council thinks it’s OK to throw money around and overspend by 20 times its own budget."

Councillor Anthony Blagg, cabinet member for the environment, said the reason for the high figure was because in May this year the authority agreed “significant” changes to the contract signed back in 1998 to finally develop the plant.

“The additional expenditure of approximately £870,000 relates to the gross costs the councils’ incurred from engaging technical, legal and financial consultants during the financial year to specifically support us in negotiations of the contract variation," he said.

"It was fully met by council’s reserves that had been set aside in previous years to fund these costs.”

Comments

Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree